An Asana alternative built specifically for project memory

Asana is built for coordinating tasks across people and deadlines. It's not designed to answer \"why did we decide this\" once a task closes and its context scrolls out of view. ContextOS holds that reasoning separately, structured to generate a fast resume brief whenever you or your team needs to pick a stalled thread back up.

Who this is for

Best if your team's Asana comments have become the de facto (and hard to search) home for decision context.

Which should you use?

Use Asana if you coordinate a team's tasks, assignments, and timelines.

Use ContextOS if you're a solo builder who needs to remember what happened in each project.

Most builders don't switch — they keep Asana for its core job and add ContextOS as the project-memory layer: session history, a decision log with reasons, a resource vault, and an AI resume briefing when they return after time away.

See the full comparison

Read the detailed ContextOS vs Asana comparison →

See a 30-second resume brief in action →

Create Project Memory →

Frequently asked questions

No. Asana coordinates team work; ContextOS is single-player memory. If you left Asana because it was overkill for solo work, ContextOS covers the part you actually needed.

Deliberately not. Each project has one next action plus full history — the goal is resuming fast, not managing a task list.

Yes. Teams keep Asana for coordination while individual builders use ContextOS for their own project memory.

Free for 5 projects with 5 AI resume briefings per month; Pro is $9/month or $90/year in USDT.