An Obsidian alternative built specifically for project memory

Obsidian's flexibility is the appeal and, for project memory specifically, also the problem: you have to design the daily-note template, the linking structure, and keep the discipline going yourself. ContextOS skips the design phase entirely — the structure (sessions, decisions, ideas, next step) is fixed from day one, and the resume brief is generated for you rather than requiring you to re-read your own notes.

Who this is for

Best if you've tried a project-log setup in Obsidian and it fell apart after the initial motivation wore off.

Which should you use?

Use Obsidian if you want a local-first personal knowledge graph of linked markdown notes.

Use ContextOS if you want structured per-project memory with an AI resume briefing and zero folder upkeep.

Most builders don't switch — they keep Obsidian for its core job and add ContextOS as the project-memory layer: session history, a decision log with reasons, a resource vault, and an AI resume briefing when they return after time away.

See the full comparison

Read the detailed ContextOS vs Obsidian comparison →

See a 30-second resume brief in action →

Create Project Memory →

Frequently asked questions

No. Obsidian is a long-term knowledge base; ContextOS replaces only the project-tracking part — where daily notes and folders were standing in for project memory.

No — ContextOS is a web app with data private to your account and exportable. If local-first storage is a hard requirement, Obsidian remains the better fit for notes.

Yes. Keep Obsidian for evergreen notes and thinking; use ContextOS for project state, decisions, and next actions.

Free for 5 projects with 5 AI resume briefings per month; Pro is $9/month or $90/year in USDT.